Technical Insight

GAR INSIGHT
Medical Devices Regulation (EU) 2017/745 — Medical Device Classification, Conformity Assessment & CE Marking
GAR INSIGHT · MEDICAL DEVICES & CE MARKING

CE marking a medical device under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 requires considerably more than demonstrating that a product performs as intended. Manufacturers must establish the device’s intended purpose, determine its regulatory classification, manage risks throughout its lifecycle, generate appropriate clinical evidence, demonstrate conformity with the applicable General Safety and Performance Requirements and maintain post-market controls after market entry.

Regulation (EU) 2017/745, commonly known as the Medical Device Regulation or MDR, establishes the European regulatory framework for medical devices within its scope and has applied since 26 May 2021.

The MDR replaced the previous Medical Devices Directive 93/42/EEC and Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive 90/385/EEC, while introducing substantially strengthened requirements concerning clinical evidence, traceability, post-market surveillance, economic operators and regulatory oversight.

Unlike many other CE-marked products, the conformity assessment route for a medical device is strongly influenced by its risk classification. Except for certain Class I devices that can follow a manufacturer self-declaration route, involvement of an appropriately designated Notified Body is generally required.

This GAR Insight explains MDR scope, intended purpose, device classification, General Safety and Performance Requirements, risk management, clinical evaluation, technical documentation, quality management, Notified Body involvement, UDI, post-market surveillance and CE marking.

ARTICLE GUIDE

Navigate This Article

Explore MDR scope, device classification, GSPR, risk management, clinical evidence, conformity assessment, technical documentation, Notified Bodies, UDI, post-market obligations and CE marking.

01
REGULATORY FOUNDATION

Understanding Regulation (EU) 2017/745

Regulation (EU) 2017/745 establishes requirements for placing medical devices on the EU market and putting them into service. It applies directly across EU Member States and creates a lifecycle regulatory framework extending from device design and clinical evaluation through production, market entry and post-market surveillance.

Legislation Regulation (EU) 2017/745
Common Name MDR
Date of Application 26 May 2021
CE Marking Required

The MDR places extensive obligations on manufacturers and also establishes responsibilities for other economic operators, including authorised representatives, importers and distributors.

Medical device CE marking is a lifecycle process. Compliance does not end when the CE mark is applied. Manufacturers must continue collecting and evaluating information from devices placed on the market and use that information to maintain the device’s safety, performance and regulatory conformity.
↑ Back to Article Guide
02
PRODUCT SCOPE

Is the Product a Medical Device?

Determining whether a product falls within the MDR begins with its intended purpose and mode of action. The Regulation defines medical devices broadly and covers instruments, apparatus, appliances, software, implants, reagents, materials and other articles intended by the manufacturer for specified medical purposes.

Diagnosis

Devices can be intended for diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, prediction or prognosis of disease.

Treatment

Products intended for treatment or alleviation of disease can fall within the MDR definition.

Injury & Disability

Diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for injury or disability can constitute medical purposes.

Anatomy

Investigation, replacement or modification of anatomy can bring a product within the medical device framework.

Physiological Processes

Devices can be intended for investigation, replacement or modification of physiological or pathological processes or states.

Medical Software

Software can itself qualify as a medical device when its intended purpose satisfies the applicable regulatory definition.

Product classification starts with regulatory qualification. Before asking whether a device is Class I, IIa, IIb or III, the manufacturer should first establish whether the product qualifies as a medical device under the MDR and whether other regulatory frameworks may apply.
↑ Back to Article Guide
03
REGULATORY FOUNDATION

Intended Purpose Drives the MDR Assessment

The intended purpose is one of the most important elements of medical device conformity. It describes the use for which the device is intended according to the information supplied by the manufacturer.

Intended purpose influences qualification, classification, clinical evaluation, risk management, performance claims, testing, labelling, instructions for use and the conformity assessment route.

Who?

Identify the intended patient population and, where relevant, the intended professional or lay user.

What?

Define what the device is intended to diagnose, monitor, prevent, treat, alleviate or otherwise accomplish.

Where?

Consider the intended use environment, including hospitals, clinics, laboratories, homes or other settings.

How?

Define how the device achieves its intended medical purpose and the conditions under which it should be used.

Marketing claims are regulatory claims. Website descriptions, brochures, packaging and promotional materials should remain consistent with the intended purpose and conformity assessment because broader claims can potentially change the regulatory assessment of the device.
↑ Back to Article Guide
04
RISK CLASSIFICATION

Class I, Class IIa, Class IIb & Class III

Medical devices are classified according to the classification rules in Annex VIII of the MDR. Classification reflects factors including invasiveness, duration of use, anatomical location, active function, implantability and the potential consequences of device failure.

Lower Risk

Class I

Generally lower-risk devices. Certain Class I devices can follow manufacturer self-declaration, while sterile, measuring and reusable surgical instrument subclasses involve Notified Body assessment for specified aspects.

Moderate Risk

Class IIa

Devices presenting a higher level of risk than ordinary Class I products and generally requiring Notified Body involvement.

Higher Risk

Class IIb

Devices associated with increased potential risk and generally subject to more extensive conformity assessment.

Highest Risk

Class III

Highest-risk devices, including many critical implants, subject to the most stringent conformity assessment requirements.

Classification is rule-based—not selected by preference. Manufacturers should identify all potentially applicable Annex VIII classification rules and document why the final rule and resulting class apply to the device.
↑ Back to Article Guide
05
ANNEX I

General Safety & Performance Requirements

Devices must satisfy the applicable General Safety and Performance Requirements, commonly referred to as GSPR, established in Annex I of the MDR.

The manufacturer should determine which requirements apply to the device and document how conformity with each applicable requirement has been demonstrated.

Risk & Benefit

Risks should be acceptable when weighed against the benefits provided to the patient and compatible with a high level of health and safety protection.

Design & Manufacture

Devices should be designed and manufactured to meet applicable safety and performance requirements throughout their intended use.

Chemical & Biological

Materials and substances require assessment appropriate to their nature and patient or user exposure.

Infection & Microbial

Applicable infection, contamination, cleanliness and sterility requirements should be addressed.

Electrical & Mechanical

Relevant electrical, mechanical, thermal, radiation and other physical hazards should be controlled.

Information Supplied

Labels and instructions should provide the information required for identification and safe use of the device.

A GSPR checklist should be an evidence map—not merely a list of “applicable” and “not applicable” statements. Each applicable requirement should be connected to the standards, risk controls, verification evidence, clinical evidence or other documentation used to demonstrate conformity.
↑ Back to Article Guide
06
LIFECYCLE SAFETY

Risk Management

Risk management is a continuous lifecycle process under the MDR. Manufacturers must identify known and foreseeable hazards, estimate and evaluate associated risks, implement appropriate controls and evaluate residual risk.

01

Identify Hazards

Determine hazards associated with the device and its use.

02

Estimate Risk

Evaluate foreseeable sequences of events and resulting harms.

03

Control Risk

Apply appropriate design, protective and information-based controls.

04

Verify Controls

Demonstrate that implemented controls are effective.

05

Residual Risk

Evaluate risks remaining after controls have been implemented.

06

Benefit-Risk

Evaluate benefit against residual risks where required.

07

Production Data

Feed manufacturing and quality information back into risk management.

08

Post-Market Data

Update the assessment using real-world information after market entry.

Risk management should connect directly with the rest of the technical documentation. Hazards identified in the risk-management process should be reflected in design controls, verification and validation, clinical evaluation, usability, labelling and post-market surveillance where applicable.
↑ Back to Article Guide
07
CLINICAL EVIDENCE

Clinical Evaluation

Clinical evaluation is a central MDR requirement. Manufacturers must plan, conduct and document a systematic evaluation of relevant clinical data to verify the safety and performance of the device, including its clinical benefits where applicable.

Clinical Literature

Relevant scientific and clinical literature may contribute to the evidence base where its applicability can be justified.

Clinical Investigations

Clinical investigation data may be required where sufficient clinical evidence cannot otherwise be established.

Existing Clinical Data

Available clinical experience and data may contribute where relevance, quality and applicability are demonstrated.

Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up

PMCF supports the continuing evaluation of safety and performance using information obtained after market entry.

Clinical evaluation is not simply a literature-search report. The evidence must be critically evaluated against the device’s intended purpose, claimed performance, risks, state of the art and applicable MDR requirements.
↑ Back to Article Guide
08
ANNEX II & III

Medical Device Technical Documentation

MDR technical documentation should provide structured evidence that the device has been designed, manufactured and assessed in accordance with the Regulation.

01
Device description and specification. Define the device, variants, accessories, intended purpose and intended users.
02
Qualification and classification. Document the regulatory status and applicable Annex VIII classification rules.
03
Design and manufacturing information. Describe the design, production processes and relevant manufacturing sites.
04
GSPR evidence. Map applicable Annex I requirements to the evidence demonstrating conformity.
05
Risk management. Maintain the risk-management documentation and associated controls.
06
Verification and validation. Include applicable testing and validation evidence.
07
Clinical evaluation. Maintain the clinical evaluation and supporting clinical evidence.
08
Labels and instructions. Maintain controlled copies of product labelling and information supplied with the device.
09
Post-market documentation. Include the applicable PMS plan and associated post-market documentation.
10
EU Declaration of Conformity. Maintain the declaration supporting CE marking after conformity has been established.
The technical documentation should tell one consistent regulatory story. The intended purpose, classification, risk management, clinical evidence, verification, labelling and post-market strategy should describe the same device and the same claims.
↑ Back to Article Guide
09
QUALITY SYSTEM

Quality Management Under the MDR

Manufacturers must establish, document, implement, maintain, keep up to date and continually improve a quality management system proportionate to the risk class and type of device.

Regulatory Strategy

Processes should support conformity assessment and continuing compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.

Design Controls

Product design and development should be planned, reviewed, verified, validated and controlled.

Supplier Controls

Outsourced processes, suppliers and subcontractors should be controlled according to their effect on device conformity.

Production Controls

Manufacturing processes should consistently produce devices conforming to approved specifications.

CAPA

Nonconformities and quality problems should feed into appropriate corrective and preventive action processes.

Post-Market Processes

PMS, vigilance and feedback should be integrated into the manufacturer’s quality system.

ISO 13485 is highly relevant—but the legal requirement comes from the MDR. A quality system should be evaluated against the manufacturer’s actual MDR obligations rather than assuming that possession of an ISO 13485 certificate automatically demonstrates compliance with every MDR requirement.
↑ Back to Article Guide
10
MARKET ACCESS ROUTE

MDR Conformity Assessment

The conformity assessment route depends primarily on device classification and the relevant provisions of the MDR.

Device Class Typical Regulatory Position Notified Body
Class I Manufacturer can generally self-declare conformity where the device is not sterile, does not have a measuring function and is not a reusable surgical instrument. Generally no
Class Is Notified Body involvement applies to aspects concerning establishing, securing and maintaining sterile conditions. Yes — limited scope
Class Im Notified Body involvement applies to aspects concerning conformity with metrological requirements. Yes — limited scope
Class Ir Notified Body involvement applies to aspects relating to reuse, including cleaning, disinfection, sterilisation, maintenance and functional testing as applicable. Yes — limited scope
Class IIa Requires conformity assessment involving an appropriately designated Notified Body. Yes
Class IIb Requires Notified Body conformity assessment with requirements reflecting the higher risk classification. Yes
Class III Subject to the most stringent conformity assessment and technical documentation requirements. Yes
Notified Body involvement does not transfer manufacturer responsibility. Even where a Notified Body assesses the quality system and technical documentation, the manufacturer remains responsible for the device’s conformity with the MDR.
↑ Back to Article Guide
11
THIRD-PARTY ASSESSMENT

The Role of the Notified Body

A Notified Body is an independent conformity assessment organisation designated to perform specified activities under the MDR.

Manufacturers requiring Notified Body involvement should select an organisation whose designation scope covers the relevant device technologies and conformity assessment activities.

QMS Assessment

The Notified Body can audit the manufacturer’s quality management system against applicable MDR requirements.

Technical Documentation

Applicable technical documentation can be reviewed as part of the conformity assessment.

Certification

Certificates are issued within the scope of the conformity assessment where applicable requirements have been satisfied.

Surveillance

Continuing surveillance forms part of maintaining certification where Notified Body involvement applies.

Select the Notified Body before the project reaches its final stage. Device scope, classification, technical documentation readiness, QMS maturity and Notified Body designation should be considered early in the market-access strategy.
↑ Back to Article Guide
12
IDENTIFICATION & TRACEABILITY

Labelling, UDI & Registration

MDR market access involves more than placing the CE mark on the device. Manufacturers must also address applicable identification, traceability, labelling, registration and economic-operator requirements.

Device Labelling

Labels should contain the information required by the MDR and appropriate information for safe identification and use.

Instructions for Use

Where required, instructions should communicate intended purpose, safe-use information, warnings, precautions and other necessary information.

UDI

The Unique Device Identification system supports identification and traceability throughout the supply chain and device lifecycle.

Basic UDI-DI

The Basic UDI-DI acts as a key identifier for a device family within regulatory documentation and relevant database processes.

Economic Operators

Manufacturer, authorised representative, importer and distributor responsibilities should be established as applicable.

Registration

Applicable actor and device registration requirements should be completed using the systems and timelines legally applicable to the device and economic operators.

Non-EU manufacturers require an EU authorised representative. Where the manufacturer is not established in an EU Member State, the MDR requires designation of a sole authorised representative established within the Union for the relevant device.
↑ Back to Article Guide
13
AFTER MARKET ENTRY

Post-Market Surveillance & Continuing Compliance

The MDR requires manufacturers to systematically and actively gather, record and analyse relevant information concerning the quality, performance and safety of devices throughout their lifetime.

Post-Market Surveillance

The PMS system collects and evaluates information concerning devices placed on the market.

PMCF

Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up can provide continuing clinical evidence concerning device safety and performance.

Vigilance

Applicable serious incidents and field safety corrective actions must be handled and reported in accordance with MDR requirements.

Trend Reporting

Statistically significant increases in certain incidents or expected undesirable side-effects can trigger reporting obligations.

Risk Management Updates

Post-market information should feed back into the risk-management process and benefit-risk evaluation.

Clinical Evaluation Updates

Clinical evaluation should remain current using relevant post-market and clinical information.

CE marking is not the end of conformity assessment. Real-world information obtained after market entry can require updates to risk management, clinical evaluation, labelling, technical documentation, CAPA and other regulatory controls.
↑ Back to Article Guide
14
COMPLIANCE ROADMAP

From Medical Device Concept to CE Marking

A successful MDR project is usually easier to manage when regulatory requirements are integrated into product development from the beginning rather than addressed only after the device has been designed.

01

Qualify

Determine whether the product falls within the MDR.

02

Define Purpose

Establish the intended purpose, users, patients and claims.

03

Classify

Apply the relevant Annex VIII classification rules.

04

Plan Conformity

Select the applicable conformity assessment route.

05

Manage Risk

Establish and maintain the device risk-management process.

06

Generate Evidence

Complete appropriate verification, validation and clinical evaluation.

07

Build Documentation

Compile technical documentation and the required QMS evidence.

08

Notified Body

Complete third-party conformity assessment where required.

09

Declare

Prepare and sign the EU Declaration of Conformity.

10

CE Mark

Apply CE marking in accordance with the applicable MDR requirements.

11

Register

Complete applicable identification and registration requirements.

12

Monitor

Maintain PMS, vigilance, clinical and regulatory compliance.

The CE mark represents the outcome of the conformity process—not the beginning of it. It should be applied only after the manufacturer has completed the applicable MDR conformity assessment, prepared the required technical documentation, obtained Notified Body certification where necessary and drawn up the EU Declaration of Conformity.
↑ Back to Article Guide

From Medical Device Development to Demonstrable EU Conformity

MDR conformity begins with a clearly defined intended purpose and a defensible regulatory classification. Those decisions determine much of the compliance strategy that follows, including the applicable requirements, clinical evidence, conformity assessment route and degree of Notified Body involvement.

The manufacturer must then establish a connected body of evidence demonstrating that the device satisfies the applicable General Safety and Performance Requirements. Risk management, verification and validation, clinical evaluation, quality management and technical documentation should support one another rather than exist as disconnected compliance documents.

That responsibility continues after CE marking. Post-market surveillance, vigilance, PMCF where applicable, production information and real-world experience must feed back into the manufacturer’s risk management, clinical evaluation and quality processes throughout the device lifecycle.

The Clinical & Safety Question

Does the available technical and clinical evidence demonstrate that the device achieves its intended purpose with risks that are acceptable when weighed against its benefits?

The Conformity Question

Can the manufacturer demonstrate through classification, GSPR assessment, risk management, clinical evaluation, technical documentation, quality controls and post-market processes that the device continues to satisfy Regulation (EU) 2017/745?

The defining MDR compliance question is: can the manufacturer demonstrate that the medical device actually placed on the European market corresponds with the intended purpose, classification, design, clinical evidence, risk controls, technical documentation and quality system on which its CE marking is based?
Technical note: Regulation (EU) 2017/745 establishes requirements for medical devices placed on the European Union market or put into service. Applicable requirements and conformity assessment routes depend on factors including device qualification, intended purpose, classification, design characteristics and specific MDR provisions. Manufacturers should verify the current consolidated Regulation, applicable implementing and delegated acts, MDCG guidance, harmonised standards, Common Specifications where relevant, EUDAMED requirements and applicable transitional provisions when conducting a product-specific regulatory assessment. This article provides general technical information and does not replace a device-specific regulatory, clinical or conformity assessment.
GLOBAL ALLIANCE REGISTER

How Global Alliance Register Can Support You

Global Alliance Register supports manufacturers, suppliers and responsible economic operators with independent technical-assurance services relevant to EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) within the healthcare and medical technology context. Based on the article's emphasis on regulatory review, conformity assessment and certification, GAR can coordinate competent specialists, laboratories, inspectors, auditors and accredited conformity-assessment resources as appropriate to the actual technical need. Within the context of this article, Global Alliance Register can support you in the following areas:

01

Determine the applicable conformity-assessment route for EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), coordinate the required technical evidence and support independent third-party or Notified Body involvement where the governing framework requires it.

02

Review test records, inspection evidence, calculations, reports and other technical documentation relating to EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) for completeness, consistency and traceability.

03

Review the applicable regulatory, technical and scope requirements for EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and define the responsibilities, classifications and assurance pathway relevant to the product or equipment.

04

Map the applicable standards, specifications, acceptance criteria and technical requirements for EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) to the evidence needed to demonstrate compliance, quality or performance.

05

Identify the changes affecting EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), perform a structured impact assessment and develop a transition plan covering responsibilities, timing, documentation and implementation evidence.

Scroll to Top